As a follower of Jesus, I also celebrate metaphor (well, to be fair, as a student of literature I've long celebrated metaphor, so when I really started reading the Bible, I was thrilled to find Jesus teaching through parables, similes, and metaphors). Jesus used mustard seeds and fields, bread and wine, sculptors and sheep, rocks and waters. Metaphors engage that space in our consciousness that requires making relationships between things to deepen our understanding of a topic. I might even say that, when allowed, metaphors can also develop our empathy, because in order to understand the lesson of the metaphor, we must try to see something from a different perspective. Our muscle to apply that to people outside of our immediate bubbles is then exercised.
There's a popular metaphor floating around these days. You've heard it: Drain The Swamp. Before I go further, the literature lover in me just has to critique this metaphor. If you were to actually drain a swamp, you would only lose the water. Everything that makes a swamp, well, a swamp, would still be there. The cypress trees, Spanish moss, alligators, snakes, lily pads, would either clog the drain, or just be standing on dry ground, dehydrated. (Talk about climate change.....) "Clear the Swamp" might make a little more sense, but that's not what we're working with.
So then the question is: what does the swamp refer to? We've heard that it means elite politicians and longstanding bureaucrats. Does it? My first grade daughter is being taught to support her answers by finding evidence in the text, the story, or the calculations. It's not enough to be "right," to have the actual correct answer, you must be able to look back in the material in front of you and point to where you found the information. In this, there is no room for alternative facts. It's either there, or it isn't.
Now, my Table Setters co-founding partner and might I disagree here, and that's okay, because I feel compelled to step into this swamp and look for the evidence of what is right in front of us this past week. I believe it represents a core tenet of the problem of Whiteousness. We have a new administration that is being comprised of some of the most socially and financially elite folks in our country. In turn, they are also the least academically educated administration in quite some time. Now, I do understand the frustration with academic elites, people who always think they are smarter than everyone else. We, with college degrees, must always tread carefully here. However, the few browner skinned members in the new cabinet are the most educated, while many of the pink-skinned members have only bachelor's degrees. In other words, there is financial privilege at play here, and it appears that the privilege is long-standing for many. The non-white folks have to get the highest degree of education possible to sit at the table with white folks who've not had to work nearly as hard. So: will we be replacing the swamp of political elites with racial and socio-economic elitism? I don't think that's a good swap. And that is an understatement.
We also have orders that, when looking at it, does not seem to go after anything elite whatsoever. Take a look at this swamp of words gathered this past week through a collection of online news sources and social media. I've added my interpretation between the lines in red, in my attempt to try and understand exactly what, or who, constitutes this so-called "swamp."
* On January 19th, 2017, funding for the DOJ’s Violence Against Women programs is going to be cut. (perhaps women who claim to have been assaulted are part of the swamp?)
* On January 19th, 2017, funding for the National Endowment for the Arts is going to be cut. (artists and keepers of culture might be the alligators we need to get rid of?)
* On January 19th, 2017, funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is going to be cut. (or maybe it's the writers and producers of television programming that isn't persuaded by massive business and advertising revenue)
* On January 19th, 2017, funding for the Minority Business Development Agency will be cut. (so, non-white business development is a problem? Or, wait, who's the minority now? Last time I checked, the numbers are rapidly changing....)
* On January 19th, 2017, funding for the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services will be cut. (so police officers who are working to improve relationships with their communities are the swamp monsters?)
* On January 19th, 2017, funding for the Legal Services Corporation will be cut. (people who need financial assistance to defend themselves are gumming up our country?)
* On January 19th, 2017, funding for the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ will be cut. (well, certainly, anyone demanding civil rights are just swampy complainers, yes?)
* On January 19th, 2017, funding for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy will be cut. (aha, it's the scientists who are trying to make sure our resources and environmental needs can be sustained for my grandchildren, and yours.)
* On January 20th, 2017, roughly 230 protestors were arrested in DC and face unprecedented felony riot charges. Among them were legal observers, journalists, and medics. (why can't they just accept defeat?)
* On January 23rd, 2017, it was said that 3-5 million people voted “illegally” and thus impacted the popular vote. (wait, it's the voting populace who needs to be drained, now?)
* On January 24th, 2017, the EPA was ordered to stop communicating with the public through social media or the press and to freeze all grants and contracts. (there's those snaky environmentalists again).
* On January 24th, 2017, HR7, a bill that would prohibit federal funding not only to abortion service providers, but to any insurance coverage, including Medicaid, that provides abortion coverage, went to the floor of the House for a vote. (hmmmm, maybe it's sick people, or people who can't afford to cover their mistakes up more privately.)
* On January 24th, 2017, an order for the resumption of construction on the Dakota Access Pipeline, while the North Dakota state congress considers a bill that would legalize hitting and killing protestors with cars if they are on roadways, as long as you say it was an "accident." (of course, the swamp is the last remaining Native Americans! if we could just get rid of them.....)
*On January 25th, 2017: the wall plans are ramped up and a widespread Muslim ban. (and simultaneously not allow sneaky, swampy Mexicans and Muslims to enter or remain...)
I'm really confused. If the swamp actually referred to career politicians, why then are there no immediate orders to limit their power? Why do we see, instead, so many orders to diminish services closely connected with our citizenry? Or, maybe more accurately, certain sectors of our citizenry?
This so-called swamp is getting, well, muckier. What will the draining look like? Will we all get flushed in some way or another? I believe the time to pay attention is great and critical, but we will have to seek information outside of the news, outside of social media, and actually get to know a Syrian neighbor before they are deported. Who is the real threat, who are the real dangers? How will anyone be able to tell? My list above is just a list until I get to know some of these so-called problem children.
Again: words matter.
I attended a planning meeting at the Detroit Historical Society a few days ago as 2017 marks the 50th Anniversary of the events of 1967. During the meeting, one person said something quite profound: "I've found that I can tell a lot about someone by how they describe 1967: Was it a riot? Was it an uprising? Was it a rebellion? Was it a revolution?"
You can see, if you call it a riot, you frame all those involved as the problem. If you call it an uprising or a rebellion, you imagine the "powers-that-be" as the problem. There is a mural a few blocks from my house that refers to 1967 as "Detroit's 1776." Is it that far of a stretch? We can learn about colonial rebels who massively destroyed British property and cargo by dumping tons of tea into the Boston waters. People died. But we frame it as just and necessary, because it led to the formation of the United States of America. I've heard some talk already of how the big auto companies fled Detroit to set up shop in the suburbs and overseas, and this decimated the incomes of many of our neighbors. Meanwhile, car insurance rates were soaringly high and a public transit system was diminished to relative uselessness. How frustrated and angry must our neighbors, now in their 70s and 80s, have been to live with such instability and entrapment? I hope to learn more about this as I continue to get involved this year, by hearing from first-hand accounts of people who actually lived through being defined as citizens, (well, actually the word-choices are often much more damning) in the "worst city in America." Take a minute to watch the video below:
|Click here to learn more|
Pay attention friends. And I'm including people that I disagree with in that mix. I believe we are all prone to being divided and conquered, and if we don't find our similarities and our common hopes and dreams across race, class, faith, and political ideology, we will all go down Titanic-style. We are being divided, that is for certain, so I have to ask, are we being conquered?
May it be so. Let's roll up our sleeves and get to know one another. See you at the Table.
+Matthew John Schmitt @matthewjschmitt